Reviews for RESTClient, a debugger for RESTful web services.
RESTClient, a debugger for RESTful web services. by Chao ZHOU
Review by zoomer
Rated 5 out of 5
143 reviews
- by shui, 2 months agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 17105056, 3 months agoRated 1 out of 5
- by Firefox user 16971241, 4 months agoRated 5 out of 5
- by John Parker, 5 months agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Atatat, 7 months agoRated 1 out of 5During the use of the client, some strange requests started to come into our server
Like this one
183.134.104.171 - [31/Jul/2021 16:02:36] "CONNECT www.baidu.com:443 HTTP/1.0" 501
Sadly don't have time to check out its code
Removing the extension - by Simon, 9 months agoRated 5 out of 5
- by mrw, 10 months agoRated 4 out of 5
- by smoore4, 10 months agoRated 5 out of 5I absolutely LOVE this add-on. Simple, but effective. For certain projects, I will use it 30-40 times a day....never had an issue with it. Does multiple security configs, shows the curl command, formats the json. Top notch tool without the "kitchen sink" approach of postman.
Also, I have traced GET and POST and have never seen any network traffic except to the localhost service I created. - by Roll, 10 months agoRated 4 out of 5
- by SongPing, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Avnish, a year agoRated 3 out of 5
- by Ed Eaglehouse, a year agoRated 4 out of 5Seems like a fairly capable tool, but interface is awkward. Can only add a single header at a time. Presentation is a little primitive. Otherwise, I like that it's open to customizing the request. "OK" button being spelled "Okay" is unconventional and the request and response headers being displayed in different formats is a bit annoying. Would be nice if common/necessary headers like Authorization and Content-Type had a dedicated input area, even if it was just a textbox for bulk entry. Generating an equivalent CURL command is a very nice touch.
- by Marco Prado, a year agoRated 4 out of 5Todo muy bien, pero quedaría excelente con un tema oscuro, por favor aplíquenlo, es lo único que le falta :(
- by Amaresh, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14676229, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 16074804, 2 years agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Evgeny Shiryaev, 2 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by gq_2005, 2 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Darson, 2 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Hertz, 2 years agoRated 1 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14363412, 2 years agoRated 5 out of 5