Um die Tausenden von hier verfügbaren Add-ons auszuprobieren, laden Sie Mozilla Firefox herunter, eine schnelle, kostenlose Möglichkeit, im Internet zu surfen!Schließen
Wählen Sie aus Tausenden von Zusatzfunktionen und Stilen, um sich Firefox zu Eigen zu machen.Schließen
|Benutzer seit||June 16, 2008|
|Anzahl der entwickelten Add-ons||0 Add-ons|
|Durchschnittliche Bewertung der Add-ons des Entwicklers||Noch nicht bewertet|
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=843727#c13Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (1.3.2) abgegeben.
The CPU issue appears to be fixed but now the reported memory consumption is completely wrong.
I have 2 FF windows open, one shows 707MB, the other 706MB. about:memory reports 1277MB private. Process explorer shows 1319.
Community-supported version, works for FF26:
Unusable on FF 26.
CPU jumps to 100% every several seconds.
Console shows this:
usingOldMemoryReporter returnValue = false
refreshMemoryNewCallback aProcess=, aUnsafePath=resident, aKind=2, aUnits=0, aAmount=540528640, aDescription=Memory mapped by the process that is present in physical memory, also known as the resident set size (RSS). This is the best single figure to use when considering the memory resources used by the process, but it depends both on other processes being run and details of the OS kernel and so is best used for comparing the memory usage of a single process at different points in time.
Once I disabled this addon, the problem stopped.
Incompatible with current versions of TB.
Does not work, no support.
Tried it on a couple of Tumblr "archive" pages.
Don't see the difference.
There are two problems with this extension:
1) It does not remove all redirects.
For example, using Google's search-by-image: http://tinyurl.com/orq5aqqThe redirect on the images are not removed.
2) More importantly, it completely breaks sites that use google search internally.
For example, https://stackexchange.com/search?q=regex
This review is for 1.4.0 and replaces my previous reviews.
Linkificator is an actively supported extension and shows steady improvement between versions. The developer is responsive, takes bug reports seriously and is open to suggestions.
While there is still some room for ongoing improvement, I am comfortable giving Linkificator the highest 5-star rating. Also, I would like to thank the author for the add on and the ongoing support.
Good Job, Marka Pola!
Edit: 1.5.0 took care of most false positives.
This review is for 1.3.0 and replaces my previous reviews.
Linkificator is an actively supported extension and shows steady improvement between versions. The developer is responsive, takes bug reports seriously and open to suggestions (that is not to say that the developer will always agree with your ideas, but they will be considered).
In general, this version feels snappier than previous ones, and more usable with the automatic reparsing on on/off and the addition of left/middle/right-click recognition (but see below).
I would like to thank the author for the add on and the ongoing support.
Idiosyncrasies and problems:
* The right-click/left-click operations feel reversed. The expectation is for the left-click to perform the main operation and for the right-click to pop up the menu (ideally, all 3 clicks would be customizable with a "menu" being one of the options).
* False positives (for example: a score of 8.5/10 or a similar math expression would get linkified).
Areas for future improvement:
* Having a separate on/off state for each window/tab (like Linkification).
* Right-clicking on toolbar icon should present a menu with common operations (like Linkification).
* More compatibility improvements (see for example http://piro.sakura.ne.jp/xul/textlink/index.html.en#testcases).
* Balancing aggressive detection, false positives and speed is difficult. Perhaps having several modes (quick, safe, aggressive) will solve that.
To summarize, I would like to give it a better than a 4-star review, but I feel it is not quite yet at the 5-star point. Although, with the accumulation of steady incremental fixes, it is getting pretty close -- I have a feeling that I will amend the review and the mark soon.
The add-on works most of the time but there are annoying issues and no support on the forum (apart from spam messages)Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (0.8.0.8) abgegeben.
A previous reviewer wrote:"Does not work with FF18, it just opens up the Google Homepage and no results (even the input box is locked)."
I noticed that behaviour. It happens very rarely, but it is annoying when it does as all subsequent searches will fail.Fortunately, I found a workaround:
Whenever that happens, type something into the google input box and hit enter. Even if the box is messed up and does not show the typed characters, it will still work.
Apparently this will cause the add-on to resume working.
Edit: Stopped happening.
Not maintained anymore.
I started using the TinEye reverse search a long time ago. At the time, they offered a unique and useful service. The add-on was well done, the DB was growing and there was no competition.
Then, Google introduced their own reverse image search. For a while I was running add-ons for both services and checking images on both, but it became evident that TinEye cannot compete with Google's offering. About a month ago I uninstalled the TinEye add-on.
TL;DR version: Use one of the Google reverse search add-ons instead.
The "hovering" behaviour cannot be turned off in 1.0.7, which effectively hijacks links on small images.Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (1.0.7) abgegeben.
The button maker does not work (fails with GW timeout).
The forum is down.
Looks like the developer does not care about this add-on anymore and it is going on pure inertia.
Clicking on the button mostly does nothingDiese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (0.8) abgegeben.
2.0.2 causes random crashes in FF. Do proper QA before releasing a version.Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (2.0.1) abgegeben.
An important missing functionality is the ability to detach the buttons from the search box:
With the original GoogleBar, I have the search box on the "navigation toolbar", to the right of the URL box, while I relocated the rest of its buttons to the Menu Bar, making more efficient use of available space.
Can't seem to do that with "Googlebar Lite" as all its UI elements are bunched together.
(using FF 3.6)
3.1.10 does not work on two of my machines (Firefox 3.6.18)
It gives the following error:
Error: [Exception... "'<error>' when calling method: [nsIContentHandler::handleContent]" nsresult: "0x805d0001 (<unknown>)" location: "<unknown>" data: no]
May be an incompatibility with some other extension or just a bug.
Rolling back to 3.0.2 solves the problem.
Every once in a while Xmarks randomly decides that one of my passwords is "inappropriate for the profile" anymore. It then throws a fit and refuses to sync at all until I log in to their website, go over all my passwords and manually add to all profiles the passwords that Xmarks decided to suddenly exclude. Unfortunately it only works when their web site is available (it isn't at the time I write this review).
And to add insult to injury, even when it does work, it doesn't sync passwords because they want you to get lastpass for that.
So, your passwords are uploaded to their server, some synchronization operation does occur there -- since it often fails -- but nothing is saved back to your machine? Smooth.
Um Ihre eigenen Sammlungen zu erstellen, müssen Sie einen Benutzeraccount bei Mozilla Add-ons haben.