Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Me da muita segurança ao entrar em certos sites. Minha nota é 10!!!!!

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

great tool found it useful. Great Add-on.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternen

Спасибо! Нормальное дополнение...

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

WOT is a great tool. It provides a level of protection that is certainly needed.

Like any tool (EG. a hammer), it can be abused. So, we all have to watch to be sure others are not taking liberties with it.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Greatest Add-on ever. Don't know how I got along without it.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

many people say on there reviews that this gives misleading information . IS NOT TRUE . and even if it was it will give you the option to ignore it !!!! my opinion? . this is a good security tool which gives you information about different sites before you open them , and dos not force you to follow that information. in my laptop i use WOT, AVIRAantivirus(free).COMODOfirewall (free). Equipped with these three i can challenge any other payable Internet security program

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

If you're unsure about doing business with a site this will not likely sway your decision; nor should it. Also it seems more concerned with whether or not a site has adult content than if access to said content is handled responsibly. By this measure google is "adult".

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Warning!! about the developers site Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternen

Hi, Came across the following Warning!! about the developers site, and wanted to know if anyone knows how serious it is?! >> "Web of Trust Investigation" - http://www.mywotinvestigation.com/
Also, curious to see that All names mentioned there are Finnish; strange...
Thanks.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Re: Warning

The site is part of a defamation campaign against us. This is apparently what happens when we become too successful at warning people about scams. You can learn more about it here:
http://www.mywot.com/blog/157-defamation-campaign-against-web-of-trust
http://www.mywot.com/forum/5272-can-web-of-trust-be-trusted?comment=25570#comment-25570

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

I think this is the most useful security addon for Firefox ever. I've been using it for a while now, and I find it goes well with other addons. For example, since I have NoScript, I can use the WOT ring to decide if I should allow scripts on that page.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Eu gostei bastante deste complemento, pois ao entrar em um determinado site, de cara ele nos mostra que este site pode ser confiável ou totalmente inseguro!!!!!! Pra mim, nota 10!!!!!

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen

There are are big problem with sites such as WOT. 1) WOT only compiles information on the Domain. If http://www.wannabe.com/.../.../... is a spam, porn site, guess which one gets the blame. Right. The wannabe.com domain is slammed. 2) People who contribute don't know the difference between wannabe.com and the offending page. They write reviews like it's the fault of the domain, rather than those who buy the bandwidth.
If people don't know how to write a review, shut-up, and leave it to those who do. WOT is only as good as people make it.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Re: Problems

Our system computes reputations only for hostnames. If a domain is hosting spammers, you should expect to see its reputation suffer as a result.

Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternen

Chuckling in agreement to X forgery's statement of the obvious, however WOT -might- a semi-accurate tool in finding sites that piss people off...for valid or invalid reasons. This might actually be useful in catching googlespam links, I'll check before tossing out.

*Tosses grain of salt. Err, brick. Big brick.*

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Re: Chuckling

See the response below. Our reputations tell you how much people trust a website, in which case "accuracy" is defined as whether the reputation reflects the majority opinion. Should you find some reputations only semi-accurate, please don't hesitate to share your rating with the rest of us.

Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternen

Chuckling in agreement to X forgery's statement of the obvious, however WOT -might- a semi-accurate tool in finding sites that piss people off...for valid or invalid reasons. This might actually be useful in catching googlespam links, I'll check before tossing out.

*Tosses grain of salt. Err, brick. Big brick.*

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

another FAILED experiement in "truth" by consensus Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

It accomplishes no goods via wiki*dia, and is of little value in WOT.

What? WOT is naive? nooo, really?

A bunch of people you do not know (much about) green light a site. Is that site safe? Or are the vast majority of reviewers imbeciles?

Trust people you know in real life? sure, if they can qualify their respective site endorsements

site "review" comments range from fecklessly pedantic, to drooling moron "it works for me" or "nice". no thanks

Will Obviously Tossout

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Re: failed

You should learn how the system works before judging it a failure. Did you know that ratings are weighted based on statistical analysis of each user's rating behavior? It makes the system a meritocracy where not everyone's ratings are considered equally reliable. Did you know that the silly comments, which are inevitable, don't affect the reputation? The reputation is computed from user ratings, not the comments you see on the scorecard. Still, we don't claim the reputations are the "truth" or that you'll always agree with them, they simply offer you additional information when surfing the web.

Here's a relevant quote from our "Common misconceptions" FAQ:

"We realize the average web user isn't a security professional and we don't expect them to go out and investigate random websites for safety. We have an active group of experienced users who review sites for technical safety and help the average user avoid security threats. We only expect users to share their experiences with the websites they already know, because they are uniquely qualified to do that. Being able to learn from other people's experiences is the whole reason for this service."

You can read more answers to your concerns here: http://www.mywot.com/wiki/FAQ#Common_misconceptions

It's saved my bacon Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

I love this add-on, it's saved me from some nasty stuff over the last few years I've had it installed. It's hardly noticeable until a bad site pops up.

I haven't noticed much in the way of abuse mentioned by others (such as giving a site a bad rating because you don't like it). Besides, you can always carry on and view a site that's got a poor rating, and you can also see why people are giving it the rating that they do from the comments.

I'd like to see more sites reviewed, but that'll come I guess.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Great, especially for the family Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

I love this add-on. It's especially wonderful for Google searches and my email.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternen

The idea is definitely good. Unfortunately, many users abuse this tool:(.....

For example: A particular person may hate a site. He/She gives a negative rating and tells their friends also to do so!

Did love this tool initially, but now it seems to have deteriorated a lot...

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Re: Abuse

The reputation tells you how much people trust a website. If you suspect abuse or have concerns about the reputation of a specific website, please post to our forum and request more reviews:
http://www.mywot.com/forum

Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternen

The idea is definitely good. Unfortunately, many users abuse this tool:(.....

For example: A particular person may hate a site. He/She gives a negative rating and tells their friends also to do so!

Did love this tool initially, but now it seems to have deteriorated a lot...

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

informativ und wichtig. "Fehlbewertungen" nur, wenn Einzelnutzer eine Seite alleine bewerten.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben. 

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Für mich war es bisher immer ein hilfreiches Addon.
und nicht alle Seiten die mir Rot zeigen sind schlecht.

Diese Bewertung wurde für eine vorherige Version des Add-ons (20091028) abgegeben.