- von Firefox-Benutzer 13797098, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenI've used NoScript for years. Loved it -- past tense. The current UI is beyond useless. Important features are gone, or so deeply hidden as to useless.
- von Adz, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 Sterneni don't like the new interface, also the noscript slows down my browser ALOT! never was like this in classic noscript. when i disabled the addon, my browser was back to normal speed
- von Section 9, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenThe interface for the android version really sucks when compared to windows7/8/10 It's not clear in anyway how to use it. You are stuck with guessing everything. From actions to symbol identification. I've been using this since it first released on my windows desktop. It has always worked flawless. Without a doubt it's the single most important Addon for Firefox period. 5 stars for the win version. This android version is a pile. It CAN and should be Improved to function better. There's no button or anything. You have to open options scroll to the bottom it opens a new page etc etc.
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13693374, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenSeems like a good idea, but it would block some useful features of websites, I could not re-enable. Even after add-on was deactivated the websites still did not act normally. I deleted the add-on and websites still not working properly. I had to do a complete Refresh of Firefox to get things back to normal. I cannot recommend this add-on.
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13551624, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenThird try for me. Id love to use this addon again. Still bad. Not as bad as where you started, but..
Why does some domains show up up to four times(!) in the list (black, white, with http, without http) ? Whatever the reason, it wasnt like that before (old addon), so I guess it does not need to be like that now.
The popups xss are ANNOYING.
When you browse a new site and click on noscript, its still very hard to determine what is blocked and what not, at a glance. It takes time to look to the whole list. It is really not very intuitive. Not at all actually, sorry.
Reduce the number of entries. (Group those beloging to the same domain and hide whatever the seperation is good for under custom)
Right align the text of the entries!! The list looks horrible and is hard to read.
One(!) status icon at the left of every entry to show the current status of an entry: blocked, temp blocked,allowed, temp allowed.
Colors: red and green, with and without a clock for temporaliy. Btw: No body cares if its blocked or allowed by "default".
At the right of every entry: 5 Buttons. One for each status and custom. The button which represnts the status it already has, is greyed out.
Thats it. Get rid of the bloody useless "slider"-thing. Let me explain why: its a GUI-design rule that buttons have to stay at their place. When you move the silder thing, buttons move as well. That makes pleople look around and prevens quickly using the UI.
Do that and people will get it and love it again, I promise.:)
But as I've suggested that before and you've ignored it, I am afraid you will stay on your path and get the hate.
BTW: when you try to use noscript on this very site here, it does not show the usual UI but goes directly to the options page. Odd.
- von Jivix fromwc3, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenI used to use noscript all the time. Since Quantum, though, it has just been a mess of issues for me. I was forced to uninstall today after Noscript decided to block me from visiting a majority of websites, including Google, despite it being explicitly allowed on my filter. Even setting to global "Allow all" did not work.
I really miss the speed and efficiency of the pre-Quantum Noscript. There is just a lot more clicking around and it's much harder to read the hierarchy of scripts.
- von Juri Müller, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenIch bin umgestiegen auf UMatrix Soweit ich das beurteilen kann ist die Funktionalität besser als bei NoScript. Es werden alle urls sauber gelistet (mehr als bei NoScript) und man kann sehr gezielt entscheiden, was man freigeben will. Dadurch können ganz gezielte, fein justierbare Freigaben erteilt werden.
UMatrix hat doch deutlich MEHR Einstellungsmöglichkeiten! Die ganzen Spalten der Matrix einzeln verwalten, nicht nur Skripte, und das für jede Seite einzeln, geht aber auch global... Es gibt schwarze Listen, die man sich aussuchen kann... Alles das kann NoScript nicht.
Noscript ist das Addon von Gestern!uMatrix is OK if you want to disable annoying stuff. Notice, though, that you can do the same with NoScript, managing a whitelist (TRUSTED preset), blacklist (UNTRUSTED) and even CUSTOM per-site settings.
If you're puzzled about how to configure white/black lists on NoScript, please check these:
Hope it helps
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13639687, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenUsed the classic version for years and was perfect but found the new one frustrating and awkward. I found the new UI unintuitive and more frustrating to use, it was easier to understand after the guide I saw a few days after the new one was published but still clunky and awkward to use and not user friendly at all. I've switched to Umatrix in my orange FF57 install because it is quicker/easier to use for me and more clear and intuitive. NS10 seems to be more UX design principles of looking simple and streamlined at the expense of intuitive informative less pretty design of classic NS.
The new style may suit some people more and hopefully bring more new users of that type in and do well. All my family, colleagues and friends bar 1 have abandoned it as found it none user friendly and Umatrix more their thing though so I find it hard to recommend. All the folks I imagine like the new style are ones more likely to use Chrome over FF IMHO. If it seems to go the other way and more users abandon than adopt it hopefully the implimentation will change and I may be back. Still worth trying if it sounds like your thing but not for me. Either way I appreciate the work the dev put in over the years and don't mean this as a criticism of him but more the existing implimentation and hope the feedback helps somehow and NS project does well regardless of those like me leaving it.
- von gmon, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenThe main problem is trying to find out why something, a video, etc., will not load. I see nothing but a plain blue noscript icon with npo indication that noscript has blocked anything, so I have to guess that noscript is blocking whatever element is not loading, and have to scroll to find that something has in fact been blocked even though the icon shows just a plain blue S. Isn't there some way by now to have it show that something is blocked??
- von Simón, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenPlease, explain in the add-on description why does NoScript now ask for a new permission to "download files and read and modify the browser's download history".
Besides, the new UI quite sucks, but the rules list semi-transparency seems to be what makes the NoScript Settings page sluggish.
- von Azarilh, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenWhoa, this new version is great! Jus' like 2 girls 1 cup!
PS: Why NoScript need to read the download history now? LOL
EDIT: Ok, that's fine. Thank you for the reply. Still, the new version is unfriendly, like others say too.
EDIT after 2 years i tried it again: UI still sucks, my rating remains 2/5. Too bad.Unlike "legacy" add-ons, WebExtensions cannot interact with your filesystem directly. The restored "Export" feature actually goes through the browser.downloads API to let you save your configuration locally.
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13515039, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenIn its current state, it is barely serviceable. It is still better than nothing, I know, because when I disabled it I started getting hijacked by rogue webpage scripts again. But it has alot of catching up to do to be as pleasing as the pre-Quantum version.
That annoying, user unfriendly popup window really has to go. The previous version had a more discreet and tolerable messaging UI at the bottom of the screen. Now it is in popup window format at the top of the page, in your face to annoy you very quickly.
And a suggestion of a much needed feature. An option dedicated to automatically allowing Facebook scripts. Since nearly every website now days has scripts for Facebook, it is getting tiresome to have to allow Facebook with nearly every website I visit.
- von Roelof, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenThe addon doesn't save trusted, untrusted and custom entries. Maybe the plugin stores information in non-persistent storage (which is cleared with any privacy-aware configuration).
This makes the plugin unusable, as re-allowing all services every single time is way more time consuming than just blocking scripts alltogether.
And even if you manage to save settings, they're not synched, so users who use two or more devices need to re-apply settings every time, on every. single. device.
The old version worked a whole lot better, it's a shame this level of quaity has not yet been achieved on the new WebExtension version.
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13577838, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenThe latest extension for Firefox Quantum is a real PITA because whitelisted sites are not saved, so they have to be recreated every time FF restarts. Extremely annoying and time consuming.