Antwort von Nodetics
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 7 Jahren"What bothers me the most is how Feedbro reacts to Feeds with the same Timestamp. It should just list all."
What do you mean? Feedbro does not hide or drop any articles based on timestamps.
"The other thing is, not matter what I set for "Maximum Entries to save" in a specific Feed, it just uses the default Settings of 100."
This is not really true. The default setting does affect how many articles Feedbro fetches from the feed source (XML) with a single HTTP load request (maximum being 100 at once) but if you set a feed specific max entries to save e.g. to 500, that's the maximum amount of articles that feed can contain - it will just take some time to accumulate that number of articles. Which feed URLs publish more than 100 articles at once?
Edit: Feedbro 3.35.2 can now load N articles with one HTTP GET request. N is the maximum number of items to save for the feed so if the feed has a feed specific max value, it can be even 2000.
What do you mean? Feedbro does not hide or drop any articles based on timestamps.
"The other thing is, not matter what I set for "Maximum Entries to save" in a specific Feed, it just uses the default Settings of 100."
This is not really true. The default setting does affect how many articles Feedbro fetches from the feed source (XML) with a single HTTP load request (maximum being 100 at once) but if you set a feed specific max entries to save e.g. to 500, that's the maximum amount of articles that feed can contain - it will just take some time to accumulate that number of articles. Which feed URLs publish more than 100 articles at once?
Edit: Feedbro 3.35.2 can now load N articles with one HTTP GET request. N is the maximum number of items to save for the feed so if the feed has a feed specific max value, it can be even 2000.
745 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18696748, vor 10 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Heathen Hammer, vor 10 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Dell, vor 11 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Yuval Pecht, vor 17 TagenLove it. Works great. Just minor point, would love an undo delete feature...
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Molly Noise, vor 23 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Westerly, vor 23 TagenI love this add-on, but the lack of a search function is a massive inconvenience. If you have a lot of feeds it becomes next to impossible to find specific ones, or to troubleshoot problems with particular feeds. While you can do a browser 'find' to get feed titles, there's no ability to search for feed URLs, for example.
This becomes a massive problem if a feed becomes compromised or generates errors (as happens often enough to be an issue), because the error message or security software warning will give only the URL of the offending feed, making it next to impossible to actually find the problem feed and remove it (at least, not without going through hundreds of feeds manually one-by-one until you find the problem - something that would easily take hours to do).
It seems like such basic functionality, it's frustrating that I can't search the information that the add-on has gathered - feed name, url, etc.
Another frustrating issue is that it's very difficult to organize feeds when moving to a new device. I used to have all of my feeds arranged neatly in folders based on genre, etc. and when I tried to transfer all that over, it did not export my folder hierarchy, it only exported the feeds themselves. I now face hours of re-sorting them, and the tools for sorting are not great.
Having said all that, I use this add-on avidly and have for years. At its core I believe it's the best add-on of its kind available for Firefox. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon narancasta, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18659631, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18659622, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Intense, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18654531, vor einem MonatThis is great thank you! All the rule options are very handy, especially adding points and sorting by points. It would be even better if we could see the total number of points that each item got. Cheers
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Aenfa, vor einem MonatNot available in Private Browsing Mode. Bummer. You need to respect our privacy.
The popup that shows when clicking on the extension icon also doesn't show the authors and there's no way of dismissing all items at once so takes something like 25 clicks to dismiss 20 items. Very disappointing. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18640445, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon skip, vor 2 Monatenhas issues, lacks key features, no support from developer
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Overload, vor 2 MonatenI just started using it and I think it is wonderful, easy to use and understand, and very very helpful
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 11869916, vor 2 MonatenComes with absolutely no instructions on how it works
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 3 TagenFeedbro has a built-in help file. See the ? icon in the toolbar. - Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13594701, vor 2 MonatenSuddenly cannot read RSS feed from predb.me. It was working before. Eg: ?cats=tv-hd&rss=1
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon The Rhetorician, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Moodys, vor 2 MonatenFor some reason exports feeds as OPML does not work
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 10223270, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Nick222, vor 2 MonatenCan user export content of RSS-feed articles as text file format?
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Rio Chandra, vor 2 Monatengood plugin, smooth operation, easy to use
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13243261, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Andrii, vor 3 MonatenИгнорирует записи(считает таковые прочитанными), которые незначительно отличаются в заголовках, например, номером версии.
К сожалению отсутствует поиск. - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 16799549, vor 3 Monaten