299 Bewertungen
- von William , vor einem MonatBewertet mit 4 von 5 SternenI appreciate this addon, unfortunately I cannot use it regularly as I cannot whitelist certain sites that don't work with it enabled.
- von mts, vor einem MonatBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von Rajmeister, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 16228066, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 2 von 5 SternenOhne Whitelist macht dieses Add-on keinen Sinn, ist äusserst mühsam immer von Hand bei gewissen URLs das Add-On zu deaktivieren. Entwickler verspricht schon seit Monaten die Implementierung, bis heute gibt es immer noch keine Whitelist.
- von Firefox-Benutzer 12704184, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von Vodahmin, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 14507602, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 1 von 5 SternenToo many permissions with access to almost everything in the browser.
- von Firefox-Benutzer 12466894, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 SternenBin sehr zufrieden - reinigt wie versprochen ! Danke
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13004310, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 16576312, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 3 von 5 SternenThe lack of whitelist is a huge problem. Please add!
- von odysseus, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von ewser, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 3 von 5 SternenAlthough the addon prevents useless "google.com/url?sa..." records in browser history, it triples records of visited urls, particularly google's search query urls while logged in. Because google adds it's parameters anyway, and each parameter creates new record. So it overloads my history and I can't use it no more untill it'll be fixed. Everything's ok only when I type queries in browser address bar.
- von What???, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 1 von 5 SternenFalse claims (like the bogus positive reviews) by bots. Only strips urls about 25% of the time. For example, it won't strip the junk off this url: https://cnn.com/news/world/secret-service-purging-the-trump-loyalists-from-bidens-presidential-detail/wcm/71470dfa-5d0a-4897-abf4-9888e0e24c72. Everything after the word detail can be stripped, but it's not. Even when you enter the link manually.
If this extension doesn't clean the junk (based on the name) then change the dang name instead of confusing people.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 MonatenHi, thank you for your feedback. To address your first statement, as a student I, unfortunately, don't have enough money to buy bots.
Regarding the second statement, the CNN URL is indeed not cleaned. It's because there are no rules in our rules file for this kind of "garbage" yet. If you find URLs that are not cleaned, you can always report them via our website or email and we will add new rules for them. However, you will have to make use of this possibility. - von Firefox-Benutzer 12597444, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13737162, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 SternenThis addon significantly improves the quality of my life. Every time I copy a link from my URL bar, it's nice and clean, and I am not being tracked from it. Fantastic add-on that works great. Especially useful for things like right clicking and copying links from a Google search result (even though I try my damnedest never to use Google's search engine anymore, preferring sites like Duck Duck Go).
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13487679, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen5 stars if possible to whitelist. A whitelist is mandatory for handling banking sites.
- von Firefox-Benutzer 16348963, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 12776265, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenhello
could we have the possibility of deactivating it site by site? And with saving choices? - von Rodrigues, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von dedmazai1870, vor 2 MonatenBewertet mit 4 von 5 SternenBlocked video frame from at this link https://www.gazeta.ru/sport/news/2020/12/22/n_15394304.shtml?
frame link is https://vp.rambler.ru/player/0.2.19/iframe.html?sspJparams=%7B%22puid6%22%3A%22GAZETA_SPORT%22%2C%22puid10%22%3A%22NO%22%2C%22puid15%22%3A%22news%22%2C%22puid18%22%3A%22GAZETA_SPORT_NEWS%22%2C%22puid58%22%3A%22arshavin-andrey%22%2C%22puid59%22%3A%22covid%3Agc%22%2C%22puid59%22%3A%22zenit%3Aspartak%22%7D&id=1585257&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gazeta.ru%2Fsport%2Fnews%2F2020%2F12%2F22%2Fn_15394304.shtml%3F&aspectRatio=1.7777777777777777#widgetId=kizvw8mi.8w_1
And need a whitelist (as already suggested) - von Firefox-Benutzer 15735666, vor 3 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von h0nd, vor 3 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 SternenId expect the tracking elements of this URL to be removed by this extension:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/clearurls/?utm_source=addons.mozilla.org&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=featured
and change to:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/clearurls/
But it did not happen with this extension installed.
Same with following URL:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/get-started-firefox-overview-main-features?utm_source=desktop-snippet&utm_medium=snippet&utm_campaign=f100_week1_SUMOmainfeatures&utm_term=20603&utm_content=rel
Maybe I misunderstood or didnt configure correctly. idk.
edit: Dear Kevin R./developer, thank you for taking the time for this very well explanatory reply. since this issue was due to the browser itself, i changed the rating accordingly. thank you again!Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 MonatenHi, thank you for your feedback. You have understood the addon correctly. Actually, these tracking elements should be removed - and they usually are. However, there are technical restrictions from Mozilla for all URLs that belong to Mozilla/Firefox such as mozilla.com. These URLs must not and cannot be modified by any addon, so ClearURLs does not work on Mozilla/Firefox websites, but this is true for all addons.
You can deactivate these restrictions if you remove the affected URLs in the "about:config" from the "extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains" setting. - von Gokhlayeh, vor 3 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvery useful but need two improvement:
-a whitelist (as already suggested)
-the chance to clean a URL since clicking on a mail without needing to refresh the page - von Firefox-Benutzer 16042805, vor 3 MonatenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen