Bedømt til 4,7 ud af 5
Bedømt til 4,7 ud af 5
- af monkeyintransit, 3 timer sidenBedømt til 1 ud af 5I see my previous and honest review has been removed at least THREE TIMES now. I am reposting my HONEST review again. IMO this is snake like behavior and I will not stand for it.
If it is removed by wrongful reporting, I will post it again. I despise what I feel is, IMO, gatekeeping and I have the time to follow up to what I believe is, IMO, abuse in the reporting/flag feature for HONEST REVIEWS.
Here it is: IMO, this addon used to be very useful to me, but IMO I DO NOT LIKE the changes made since v.1.24.4. I will stick with and encourage other users to stick with this version or discontinue use altogether. I don't care how the dev(s) or anyone may attempt to explain the reasoning behind the IP/Host issue, I DON'T LIKE IT, I DON'T TRUST IT and I refuse to recommend this extension to anyone.
- af Firefox-bruger 16003289, 2 dage sidenBedømt til 5 ud af 5Tatsächlich ein sehr ressourcenschonendes Addon. Und die Blocklisten, die nicht standardmäßig aktiviert sind, kann man in den Einstellungen einfach per Checkbox setzen statt mühsam selbst die Blocklisten von z.B. GitHub holen zu müssen. Vielleicht nicht der größte Funktionsumfang im Vergleich zu anderen Addons aber trotzdem durchaus ausreichend.
- af rion, 2 dage sidenBedømt til 1 ud af 5Update: Repeat again: No interest to read technical. from my view of point as an user I see the addon fails to work on websites in one browser and works perfectly in others.
So it is the work of technical specialist (the addon creator) among others technical specialists (browser computer programmers).
Please do not reply just as to reply and make some one the victim. Just solve the technical problem on your side.
Thank you and I hope you will be more carefully to read user review because most users are professional not in your area.
Mix together two programs functionalities leads to wrong way working tool.
I tried to send email to developer but got infinite sign up..sign up . I am just user one of most people whom programmers create software. No interest to read technical. Please check this link it works perfectly in Chrome and broken in Firefox (no flyer to see), Chrome 84 /Firefox 68. Windows 64 English. ublock installed by default only, no any other addons/extensions.
Svar fra udviklerenskrevet en dag sidenYour link works fine on Firefox stable on my side. uBO enforces filters from filter lists, and filter list maintainers are responsible to fix filter issues:
- af eyecu, 2 dage sidenBedømt til 4 ud af 5separating uBO from uMatrix, as gorhill did, and then adding an advanced mode to uBO, was a mistake in my opinion that has led to a lot of confusion and overlapping functionality - and now some of us need to run both instead of just one
that said, i think uBO is the best static/ad blocker out there ... by far ... but its dynamic capability is useless for me personally