Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Beautiful, does what its supposed to do.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.5). 

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Excellent. You can add file signatures, such as HTML files. Does the work.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.5). 

It works if you understand how to use it. Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Signatures go at the bottom of the page. Headers go at the top of the page. If you want your stuff at the top of the page, then I'd suggest that you look for a header add on or find a stationery add on.

Please stop criticizing the developer of programs for writing a program that does EXACTLY what it's supposed to do. If your used to the the bug that was in Outlook causing it to put the signature improperly at the top then please use that instead.

If you want a larger font or a line break or any other formatting then learn to use HTML but stop complaining when you don't know how to use a program. It works just as advertised. You just need to learn how to use it if these are your complaints.

Read the authors FAQ if you don't understand something BEFORE you start complaining. You can read it here.
http://mozext.achimonline.de/signatureswitch_faq.php

I'm sure that people will keep complaining about what they don't understand, but I guess there's just no helping people like that.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.5). 

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

wonderful, support html signatures format, switching without problems in single click... essential addon

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.5). 

Ohodnoceno 1 z 5 hvězdiček

2 thumbs down
1. Can't figure how to insert line breaks - so signatures are a continuous line of text.
2. Signatures are treated same as Thunderbird's signatures - i.e. in small grey font. So don't see the point for this add-on when TB 3.0 suffers same fault.
3. As others have already mentioned - instead of inserting signature at the cursor point or end of your message, it always places signature at the end of the message.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.5). 

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

I don't know why everyone is complaining about the developer or the extension. This extension does exactly what it's supposed to do, and that is to comply with the IETF's RFC 1845. It supports text sig blocks and also more complex HTML sig blocks the way I would expect it to support them. In other words, it works.

Regardless of what people think about this extension not supporting top posting, it works as it was intended to work and, for the most part, works well. You shouldn't drop your rating because you don't like bottom posting. After all, bottom posting is still the Internet e-mail standard. Suppose you like interleaved posting. Are you going to rate this extension lower because it doesn't support interleaved posting? Interleaved posting, just like top posting, isn't part of RFC 1845, either.

I'm not sure about this, but I believe top posting was propagated by Outlook and it top posted due to a bug, not by design. Imagine buggy software coming from Micro$oft!

Be that as it may, I think most people top post because that is the way Outlook worked and they got used to it. Plain and simple.

An RFC is not a standard. It's a recommendation. So maybe this developer is a little opinionated. The fact of the matter is that, in Internet e-mail parlance, a signature always appears at the very end of an e-mail and is always preceded by two dashes followed by a new line code. E-mail servers, if configured properly, recognize the double dash followed by a new line code as the beginning of a signature block, or the beginning of the end of an e-mail.

The developer could, if he wanted, support top posting by developing code that would insert a signature block without prepending two dashes followed by a new line code, perhaps prepending only a blank line or some other codes (like a double equal sign or double tilde) that an e-mail server would not interpret as a true signature block. That is how Evolution, the Mac version of Outlook developers chose to implement top posting. He could also support interleaved posting, too, if he were so inclined. It probably wouldn't be too much more difficult to write that logic than the logic to support top posting.

Many of the IETF's RFCs were written in the early-to-mid 1990s when many people used dial-up and people paid their ISPs by the minute. It was more efficient to read e-mails from top-to-bottom because the natural flow was preserved by bottom posting. Corporate America uses top posting partly because of Outlook's bug but also because the most recent and relevant information appears at the top of a business e-mail; if someone needs to know the history of the communication, he or she knows enough to read the e-mail from the bottom up. There's really no big deal.

Not that my opinion means anything, but I think many of the IETF's RFCs that date back to the "beginning" of the general public's use of the Internet need to be revisited, especially those that make recommendations for Internet e-mail.

Maybe Achim will read this review and have second thoughts about his stance... and, then again, maybe he won't.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.5). 

Ohodnoceno 2 z 5 hvězdiček

The fact that you have to create the signatures as files manually is a big drawback.
I created my signatures as UTF8 files using textedit on the mac, but when i insert them the æøå charectores are encoded incorrectly. Editing the files and saving them in a differet format didn't change the signatures (i pressed the edit button in the extension), picking a different file didn't change it, even on reboot the signature still was the same when i originaly picked the file.
Bottom posting is also a big issue.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.5). 

Ohodnoceno 3 z 5 hvězdiček

Good tool, would give 5 star if signature would be added below the reply, and not below all previous messages. Needs an option for this at the settings.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 2 z 5 hvězdiček

Works fine for adding all types of signatures. However the only reason for me using it is that it is in my case faster to copy paste the signature to the location I want it that to type it in (I'm using a more complex HTML signature).

I am "forced" to use this until me or someone else creates a signature addon that really works well.

It would be a five star review if it would allow you to top post and put the signature below your reply. The fact that this does not work makes it a three star review. And the fact that the author of this very good add-on is so set on the fact that top posting is bad and ugly even though it is the de-facto standard in many countries. In this conviction seems to ignore the major public demand for a signarure add-on that works just makes me annoyed and therefore just the two stars...

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

With Help Could Be Great Ohodnoceno 3 z 5 hvězdiček

I agree- it would be more useful if it would insert at the cursor point rather than the end of the email. I stopped using it because it's faster to type than to scroll, cut, paste, etc. My signature needs to be with the most recent part of the email, not at the bottom where the beginning thread is.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Very good

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

No mail client can be called "complete" without a random signature feature. Thank you for adding it to TB!

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 3 z 5 hvězdiček

Not sure why there is an autoswitch for recipients but not for senders. Would be useful to have a autoswitch options for signatures based on the sender address/account.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 4 z 5 hvězdiček

It would be nice if it would switch according to which address book was showing or which address book a recipient was in

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 4 z 5 hvězdiček

Good - thanks for the extension. One problem - the added signatures disappear when TB crashes. It's a real pain to have to go back and re-add the signatures all the time.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 3 z 5 hvězdiček

Would be a whole lot better if you could have the option to insert at the cursor point rather than the endd of the message.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 3 z 5 hvězdiček

Overall works as advertised, I guess, but I'd like it a whole lot better if it would put the signature in the same place I specify for auto-quoting placement in Thunderbird's Account Settings / Composition & Addressing -- in particular, above the quote as others have mentioned.

Another improvement would be for it to support different settings for different email accounts. One size doesn't fit all...

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 2 z 5 hvězdiček

An useless add-on for people who keep long discussions through mails because of its signature insertion point which is only at the bottom of the reply. Unfortunately, for me, I can't use it like this. Otherwise excellent extension, if you like the signature at the end of mail it works very good.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Insertion point? Ohodnoceno 1 z 5 hvězdiček

Essentially a great extension ... Unfortunately, having the signature appear at the bottom renders it practically useless.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4). 

Ohodnoceno 3 z 5 hvězdiček

Nice idea and a good start, but it could be easier to use. It needs an option to retrieve program output directly without writing shell scripts to do all the work for it.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (1.6.4).