Should be included in Beta builds by default Ohodnoceno 4 z 5 hvězdiček

Curious why it isn't?

Also, identified one extension (Nimbus Screen Capture) as compatible when it isn't, and the Developer has acknowledged as such.

Don't work with thunderbird 52 Ohodnoceno 2 z 5 hvězdiček

need update for thunderbird 52

Good, but Needs to Support Thunderbird again. Ohodnoceno 4 z 5 hvězdiček

Good, but Needs to Support Thunderbird again.

Great Addon, but should be core. Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

e10s isn't going away, the old way is.
webextensions aren't going away, the old way is.
This should be core to the browser extensions list and in a column that I can sort on.
This add-on isn't a nice-to-have, it's effectively an upcoming bug notifier.

Tento uživatel má jednu dřívější recenzi tohoto doplňku.

Shame *ding* *ding* *ding* Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Invaluable for calling out developers for not supporting e10s.

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

very easy to use.

Useful for flagging Add-On redesign candidates Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

I have been rebuilding FF 50.0 Add-On installations for, severally, Ubuntu® 16.04.1-LTS and Microsoft® Windows® 10 Build 1607 10.0.14393.451. This Extension has verified many of my formerly used Extensions as in need of complete redesign; the Merci_chao Extension Personal Menu, needed for UI cleanliness for some Users' needs, is not multiprocess-ready at last check, and I'll probably have a Bug to file at Launchpad to give a place to track a completely new Ubufox' construction (Package xul-ext-ubufox 3.2, a Depend for FF on Ubuntu®, is not multiprocess-ready).

Useful! Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

This is useful!

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.2.2). 

Great! I can now anticipate which of my add-ons will break when multiprocess gets pushed to users who use add-ons Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Thanks so much for writing this. I was dismayed to see in about:addons after installing this that several add-ons that are very important to me don't yet support e10s, even though most of them are add-ons where you wouldn't think it'd be significant whether they're running in a single shared process or not. I'm grateful that I'll be able to track the progress my add-on collection makes towards multiprocess compatibility, and will know which developers to poke if needed.

Now we just need an add-on like this for the more terrifying impending change, the elimination of the original XPCOM and XUL add-on APIs in favor of the cross-browser WebExtensions API. That change will of course require a lot more work by devs to update their add-ons for, and reportedly the initial public version will _not_ replicate all the functionality of the old APIs.

BTW, in regards to BlackMagicZurgo's review before me, note that current public versions of Firefox disable multiprocess if you have _any_ add-ons installed, regardless of whether they're multiprocess compatible or not.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.2.1). 

Addons marked as compatible multi-process.. but are indeed not. Ohodnoceno 2 z 5 hvězdiček

Add-on Compatibility Reporter mark some addons as : "Compatible with multi-process" but, however, some add-ons are actually NOT compatibles, like, say, FireGestures or Firebug (about:support report that "some addons disabled multi-process").

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.2.1). 

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Tenho no meu navegador

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.2.1). 

Ohodnoceno 3 z 5 hvězdiček

Adds the text "Not compatible/Compatible with multiprocess" to every add-on in the manager, which is pretty ugly. Just the icon would be much better.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.2.1). 

mutilprocess ? Ohodnoceno 4 z 5 hvězdiček

j'utilise FF depuis plusieurs années actuellement v48.02
Selon ce module le test sur les 23 extensions installées et maj ,16 seraient incompatibles multiprocess
c'est pas pour demain

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.2.1). 

Ohodnoceno 4 z 5 hvězdiček

good idea , ive just seen i have a lot of non multiprocess addons lol , even though i run ff50 everything is fine though and non of the adons makes any stress ...

what i don´t like is that you guys inject a stylesheet into the addon page ... which breaks my own stylesheet for that site .. it would be enough to just insert the icon besides the adon icon honestly !

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.2.0). 

Excellent Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Works really well :)

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.0.5.1-signed.1-signed). 

Very good Addon Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Works perfect on Firefox version 37.0.2.

It will be good if page show which addons was checked with this addon or any other default addon or function checker !

I mean for every addon which has been checked will be showed below users reviews on the right side!

This will be very helpful for other users. Firefox have alot addons which is very good and I am also very satisfied. Every user use own addon he like.... but problem is that some addons doesn`t work or they not working correct. If page show which addons work perfect will be very helpful....

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.0.5.1-signed.1-signed). 

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Working great in Firefox 37

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.0.5.1-signed.1-signed). 

Ohodnoceno 4 z 5 hvězdiček

Many of us rely on this add-on to use extensions and themes WHICH WORK PERFECTLY WELL in our Mozilla programs. Mozilla insists that any add-on which doesn't explicitly list support for a given version should be disabled without any way for the user to re-enable them! This add-on gets rid of that ridiculous "feature" of Mozilla software.

Naturally, the ability to test add-ons, and mark whether or not they still work with a given version of Firefox, Thunderbird, etc., OUGHT to be built in to the software. Since it's not, this extension is critical!

Given that, I'm very disappointed that support for Thunderbird (and Seamonkey) was dropped as of version 2.0.

Furthermore, seeing that many other reviewers would like to know why as well, I really wish the author would tell us why he felt the need to drop this support.

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.0.4.1-signed.1-signed).  Tento uživatel má jednu dřívější recenzi tohoto doplňku.

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

me gusta!

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.0.1.1-signed.1-signed). 

Ohodnoceno 5 z 5 hvězdiček

Not bad

Tato recenze je pro předchozí verzi doplňku (2.0.1.1-signed.1-signed).