Почти хороший Rated 4 out of 5 stars

К сожалению, данное расширение блокирует ввод пароля в защищенном режиме онлайн. В остальном, это хорошее приложение.

Great Job! Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Great addon, no extras resources needed, pull out from spyware, just the best. Many Thanks!
Gracias amigo!

Suggestion Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Needs an option to disable the notification screen from opening each time BlueHell blocks a site, because you end up with a whole string of BlueHell tabs that you have to close.

Very good Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Just need to deactivate to add products in the basket at priceminister.com

Cool! Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Simply the best! I love it, thank you

Another site that needs to be White Listed Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Another site that WILL LOAD but will not work properly with Bluhell enabled. The Citibank Rewards webpage loads Okay (no notification from Bluhell therer's a problem) but BluHell blocks the functioning of the buttons on the page. Buttons all work with BluHell disabled. I'm starting a notepad list of the sites that will load fine with Bluhell but still not function properly so when a site doesn't work I will be referencing the notepad list to help know if it's Bluhell or some other add-on causing the page to not work properly. When using other add-ons like uMatrix and NoScript it would be helpful to be able to add sites that Bluhell disables to a Bluhell White List so that I know that the issue with the website does not involve Buehell.

I'm still giving Bluhell 4 stars because Bluhell work REALLY GREAT!!!! --- other than the glaring need for a White List to deal with the very small handful of sites that need to be included in the list that load w/out any notification from Bluhell there's a problem but will NOT work properly w/ Bluehell enabled.

Of course 5-stars would be what I'd rank Bluhell with a White List available to deal with the a very small handful of sites (only two sites that I'm aware of so far that load fine but Bluhell causes to not function properly) and because the list would clearly be very limited in size would presumably NOT appreciably slow down the performance of Buehell. As I've said before, clearly Bluehell does maintain a White List behind the scenes for all sites that Bluhell blocks but is then instead "allowed" by the user via the Bluhell prompt to do so. The problem is that some sites are not prompted by Bluhell so the user would presume that the site will function properly when in actuality the site is partially disabled by Bluhell which would be resolved with the ability to add the site to the White List that Bluhell already maintains for some sites "allowed" by the user anyway.

This user has a previous review of this add-on.

Simply the Best! Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Five stars without a doubt! Diego, keep up the excellent work!

Really works Rated 5 out of 5 stars

This does what it says it's supposed to do. It blocks nasty web resources.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Awesome! >:) Rated 5 out of 5 stars

It works well! Burn in the blue fire of hell ads!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

wow Rated 5 out of 5 stars

wow nice BluHell App An thnx

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Great! Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Very lightweight and simple but works well! Thanks!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Lightweight, effective, transparent blocker. Only thing missing is a settings page.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Uno de los mejores bloqueadores de publicidad. Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Lo uso en Windows, Linux y Android y funciona muy bien, me ha gustado el hecho de que bloquea paginas como softonic, gasta muy poca ram a comparación de otros.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Great performance and lightweight Rated 5 out of 5 stars

UPDATE: Disregard below, I found adware on my computer that was the source of the problem, not Bluehell (I feel dumb). Excellent add-on!

——
I've used Bluehell for over a year and been really happy with the lightweight performance. However, more and more ads seem to be getting through recently, so I'm regretfully turning ABP back on. (Example: multiple ads display on investopedia.com)

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Hi, i just visited investopedia.com and i don't see any advert there, could you please check with the Inspector the domain from where the adverts you see are served? thanks!

Block falures Rated 5 out of 5 stars

It's a great tool for more privancy, but it block some CSS Layouts too....

Already
http://www.t-online.de/

and now also
http://www.focus.de/

I wish me more and more now a white list.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Blocking of form for www.BenCarson.com Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I have wasted too much time already trying to find a way to reach the developer, so I am putting my information into this "review."

When Bluhell is activated, it blocks the generation of the note form at the following address:
https://www.bencarson.com/landing/debate/page-hf
Firefox works fine and displays the form correctly when bluhell is disabled.
I am running ff 41.0.2 on mint linux with cinnamon desktop.

I checked all sites and domains in source code of web page against the list at EasyList and found nothing there that matches.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Better than ABP Rated 5 out of 5 stars

This add-on is away better than ABP. Left abp a year ago and never regretted it. This addon is essential to have on Firefox or Pale moon!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Incrível! / Awesome! Rated 5 out of 5 stars

PORTUGUESE:
Com certeza esse add está na lista dos "não podem faltar"! Eu uso desde a primeira versão e vem se aprimorando e melhorando desde então.
Parabéns e obrigado aos desenvolvedores!

ENGLISH:
Surely this add is on the list of "can not miss"! I use since the first version and has been improving and increasing since then.
Congratulations and Thanks to the developers!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Does What It Says Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I don't think the ad blocking is very effective so I still use Ad Block Plus. However, it's firewall is excellent - whenever it blocks a site; I stop and think whether I really want to go there.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2). 

Nice Rated 4 out of 5 stars

I'm a cable cutter/video streamer. Works quite well, and much easier on resource usage than AB+, but doesn't seem to block as many video ads, even though its detected. Seems to happen when the ad originates from the site being watched [i.e. cc.com]. Ads on YouTube are blocked as far as I can tell with limited testing. Easy to turn off when necessary. Doesn't block the ads on google searches. I still prefer this extension, though a bit more cumbersome without site specific settings. If you're using an older computer with limited ram, this is an excellent replacement for AB+.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.5.2).  This user has a previous review of this add-on.