MatsSvensson

About me

Developer Information
Name MatsSvensson
Email address
User since February 12, 2009
Number of add-ons developed 0 add-ons
Average rating of developer's add-ons Not yet rated

My Reviews

Classic Theme Restorer (Customize Australis)

Only way to use Firefox 29 Rated 5 out of 5 stars

This is now the only reason FF is still usable.
Without it, i would be using FF 28.

Please hire the person who built this,
and FIRE the incompetent noobs that made this add-on necessary.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.1.8). 

Dust-Me Selectors

Pet rock Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Doesn't seem to do a damn thing, except animating a little icon.

Pretty useless.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.2). 

JSONovich

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Brilliant!
Works perfectly, and does exactly what it should.

This will save lots of time.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.4). 

Custom Buttons

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

No real documentation, and gives useless error-messages when you try to use it.

Sorry, but this is just lousy usability and bad design.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.0.4.6). 

SortPlaces

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

WARNING!
This POS sorted ALL my bookmarks by name without warning, and no way to undo it.
Now i have to manually clean up every single folder =(

This add-on is apparently only for bulk-sorting ALL bookmarks, not to cure the lack of sorting options in the GUI.
After install there is still just "sort by name" in the menu.
So what i the point of this garbage?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.6). 

Speed Dial

Still no bookmark integration? Rated 3 out of 5 stars

This would be great if it didn't use its own totally incompatible way of storing its bookmarks.

Why not just let the user choose a regular bookmark folder as root? (or several for the tabs).

Then you would get all the functionality that can be added to the bookmark system for free.
For example automatic synchronization via xmarks, or whatever the user has set up.

Seems like this should be prio one to implement.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (0.9.1).